Moving onwards, though. The first classic of the year threw up a big surprise and the 1000 Guineas is the race with more of a reputation for shock results out of the two. However, our trends analysis doesn't always side with the short-priced favourite, and rightly so: it managed to pick the winners of both the English and the Irish Derby last year, overlooking an evens favourite in both occasions.
So, what will it give us for the 1000 Guineas? Unfortunately, its record in fillies races last year wasn't nearly as strong as with the boys, but we'll battle on and try to keep it going! It's hard to trust a filly with you money at he best of times, but who knows what will happen? As for the analysis itself, if you don't know how it works, it's explained in yesterday's 2000 Guineas trends analysis.
Stall
Stall
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Win%
|
Places
|
Place%
|
Win/Place
|
Win/Place%
|
1
|
17
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
12%
|
2
|
12%
|
2
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
12%
|
3
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
4
|
24%
|
5
|
29%
|
4
|
16
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
13%
|
5
|
17
|
0
|
0%
|
3
|
18%
|
3
|
18%
|
6
|
17
|
2
|
12%
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
12%
|
7
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
12%
|
3
|
18%
|
8
|
16
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
13%
|
3
|
19%
|
9
|
17
|
2
|
12%
|
3
|
18%
|
5
|
29%
|
10
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
12%
|
11
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
12%
|
3
|
18%
|
12
|
16
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
13
|
16
|
1
|
6%
|
3
|
19%
|
4
|
25%
|
14
|
14
|
0
|
0%
|
4
|
29%
|
4
|
29%
|
15
|
16
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
16
|
10
|
2
|
20%
|
1
|
10%
|
3
|
30%
|
17
|
9
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
11%
|
1
|
11%
|
18
|
7
|
1
|
14%
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
14%
|
19
|
4
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
The stall numbers we’re focusing on are 3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 14,
16, 18.
This year, number one and number thirteen in the draw are
non-runners and so all of the numbers above them will be moved down to fill
their places, if that makes sense. Obviously, we can’t make adjustments for
late non-runners, but it’s better if we do when possible. So, we have for the
early non-runners. We’ll hope that there aren’t any more.
Place Last Time
Out
Place LTO
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Win%
|
Places
|
Place%
|
Win/Place
|
Win/Place%
|
No Run
|
24
|
1
|
4%
|
4
|
17%
|
5
|
21%
|
First
|
112
|
10
|
9%
|
15
|
13%
|
25
|
22%
|
Second
|
46
|
2
|
4%
|
5
|
11%
|
7
|
15%
|
Third
|
30
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
7%
|
2
|
7%
|
Fourth
|
21
|
3
|
14%
|
2
|
10%
|
5
|
24%
|
Fifth
|
8
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
25%
|
2
|
25%
|
Top 2, 4th and 5th are the places we
would like a horse to have come on their last outing.
Market Position
Mrkt Pos
|
Runs
|
Wins
|
Win%
|
Places
|
Place%
|
Win/Place
|
Win/Place%
|
1
|
18
|
5
|
28%
|
4
|
22%
|
9
|
50%
|
2
|
18
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
2
|
11%
|
3
|
17
|
1
|
6%
|
6
|
35%
|
7
|
41%
|
4
|
22
|
1
|
5%
|
3
|
14%
|
4
|
18%
|
5
|
13
|
1
|
8%
|
2
|
15%
|
3
|
23%
|
6
|
18
|
4
|
22%
|
3
|
17%
|
7
|
39%
|
7
|
23
|
3
|
13%
|
2
|
9%
|
5
|
22%
|
8
|
13
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
15%
|
2
|
15%
|
9
|
20
|
1
|
5%
|
3
|
15%
|
4
|
20%
|
10
|
11
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
18%
|
2
|
18%
|
11
|
25
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
8%
|
2
|
8%
|
12
|
17
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
13
|
18
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
6%
|
1
|
6%
|
14
|
15
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
7%
|
1
|
7%
|
15
|
9
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
16
|
11
|
0
|
0%
|
1
|
9%
|
1
|
9%
|
17
|
6
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
18
|
8
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
19
|
3
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
0
|
0%
|
We’re going to focus on the first, third, fourth, sixth,
seventh and ninth in the market.
Recent Form
8 of the last 10 winners posted a Racing Post Rating of 105
or higher last time out
9 of the last 10 winners had won a listed or group race
9 of the last 10 winners won or placed on their first turf
start as a 2yo
9 of the last 10 winners had run at least 3 times as a 2yo
9 of the last 10 winners had 2 or more wins
10 of the last 10 winners had won over 6f-8f
The Big Table
Horse
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
Total
|
Bracelet
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
6
|
Ihtimal
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
7
|
Miss France
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
6
|
Manderley
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
3
|
Tapestry
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
9
|
Rizeena
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
8
|
Majeyda
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
5
|
Sandiva
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
7
|
Lady Lara
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
5
|
Betimes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
3
|
Euro Charline
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
3
|
Lightning Thunder
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
5
|
Lucky Kristale
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
9
|
Pincess Noor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
7
|
Joyeuse
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
5
|
Lamar
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
5
|
Vorda
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
8
|
So, our shortlist:
- Lucky Kristale, Tapestry
- Rizeena, Vorda
Now, you may remember that last year we used to back
anything at odds of 4/1 or longer each-way. It has been suggested on Twitter
numerous times that we eliminate each-way betting from the analysis, so we’re
going to keep track of profit/loss both ways.
We’ll never have a bet in a race if the trends analysis
gives us three or more runners, because we don’t want to stake more than three
points on a race, and we will also never have a bet with two runners unless we
can be guaranteed profit if either of them wins. (ie, there ill be no betting
on two horses if one is an evens shot.)
So, using the old methods, today’s bets would be:
“0.5pts e/w on Tapestry @ 9/1, 0.5pts e/w on Lucky Kristale
@ 10/1”
Or, if we were tp eliminate each-way betting it would be:
“1pt win on Tapestry @ 9/1, 1pt win on Lucky Kristale @ 10/1”
The very best of luck and remember not to bet more than you
can afford to lose. If 2014 is anything like 2013 was for the trends analysis,
we’ll be delighted!
No comments:
Post a Comment